How to Write Press Release from Your Saved Research (With

Research Is What Makes an Announcement Newsworthy

Here's the claim this guide is built on: a press release without research behind it announces that something happened; a press release with research behind it explains why anyone should care. Both can describe the same launch. Only one gets covered.

The format itself is fixed and has been for decades — journalists know what to expect, and deviating from it adds friction rather than personality:

1. Headline: The news in one compelling sentence
2. Dateline: City and date
3. Lead paragraph: The five Ws (who, what, when, where, why) — the most important information, in the fewest words
4. Body paragraphs: Supporting context, additional details, background
5. Quote: From a named spokesperson at the organization
6. Boilerplate: A standard paragraph about the organization
7. Contact information: Who journalists should reach for follow-up
8. End marker: "###"

What the format doesn't guarantee is that a journalist reads past the headline. That depends on newsworthiness, which comes down to three questions: Timeliness (why is this news now?), Significance (why does this matter?), and Context (what does this mean for the reader's audience?).

Saved research is the tool that answers the second and third questions. Market data, industry reports, and trend research are what turn "we launched a product" into "we launched a product that addresses a market where [specific documented problem]." The news itself doesn't change — the research is what tells a journalist why the news is worth their column inches.

---

What Your Saved Research Contributes to a Press Release

Research serves four distinct functions in a press release:

Function 1: Establishing why the news matters (the significance hook) "[Organization] announced today the launch of [product], responding to a documented surge in [specific market condition]." The [market condition] is your research, cited.

Function 2: Providing the data point in the lead paragraph or first body paragraph A single, striking data point from your research can anchor the press release: "A 2024 IDC report found that [X]% of enterprise teams cite [problem] as a critical barrier to [outcome] — [Organization]'s new [product] directly addresses this gap."

Function 3: Contextualizing the announcement within a larger trend Body paragraphs that place the announcement in market context: "This launch comes as [trend] has accelerated. According to [Research], [trend data point]..."

Function 4: Grounding the claims made in the release Press releases often make market claims that journalists will verify. Citing the source for your market claim is both more credible and easier for journalists to reference.

---

What Research Does NOT Do in a Press Release

A press release is not a research report. The research is context — it's not the story. The critical constraints:

Don't lead with the data: The lede should be about the announcement, not the market context. "A new report shows that 67% of companies struggle with X" is a story about the report. "CompanyName today launched ProductName, the first solution to [address X specifically]" is a story about your announcement.

Don't burden the press release with citations: A press release isn't an academic paper. One or two specific research citations are sufficient; a press release with six footnotes is not readable.

Don't let the research replace the news: If the announcement isn't actually newsworthy, research context doesn't make it newsworthy. Research supports significance; it doesn't create it.

---

The Research-First vs. Announcement-First Question

The research you have determines which structure to use:

Announcement-first (more common): The news is the story; the research provides context. Structure: Lead with the announcement → Body paragraph 1: Why this matters (research context) → Body paragraph 2: Details of the announcement → Quote → Boilerplate.

Research-finding-first (rare, powerful when authentic): The organization conducted or commissioned research, and the finding is itself the news. Structure: Lead with the research finding → Body paragraph 1: Why this finding matters → Body paragraph 2: What the organization is doing in response → Quote → Boilerplate.

Research-finding-first is appropriate when the research itself is the primary news hook — e.g., original data the organization has gathered and is releasing for the first time. It is not appropriate for citing third-party market research to support a product announcement.

---

Step 1: Identify the Single Best Research Data Point

From your saved research, identify the one data point that best answers "why does this announcement matter?"

The best research data point for a press release:

• Is specific (a number, a percentage, a finding — not a general trend)
• Is from a credible, nameable source (Gartner, IDC, Forrester, government agencies, peer-reviewed research)
• Is directly relevant to what you're announcing (not tangentially related)
• Is current (within 2-3 years for most business contexts; ideally within 12 months)
• Is verifiable (journalists may check the source)

RESEARCH DATA POINT SELECTION

Available data points:
1. "[Data point]" — Source: [Organization, Year] — Relevance: [How it connects to announcement]
2. "[Data point]" — Source: [...] — Relevance: [...]
3. [...]

Selected for press release: [Which one and why]
Where it goes: [Lead paragraph / First body paragraph / Second body paragraph]
How to cite in press release text: "According to [Source Organization] ([Year]), [data point]."

---

Step 2: Draft the Press Release With Research Integrated

PRESS RELEASE WITH RESEARCH CONTEXT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[HEADLINE — The news in one sentence. Makes a claim. Doesn't explain the research.]

[SUBHEAD — Optional. One sentence expanding on the headline.]

[CITY, Date] — [Organization] today announced [what was announced], [brief how/why].

[First body paragraph: Why this announcement matters — research context integrated here]
According to [Source Organization] ([Year]), [research finding that contextualizes the significance].
[2-3 sentences on what this means for the audience/customers/market the announcement serves.]

[Second body paragraph: Details of the announcement]
[What specifically was announced — product details, partnership terms, study findings, etc.]

[Third body paragraph: Additional context if needed]

[Quote from named spokesperson]
"[Quote that adds perspective — not a restatement of the lead paragraph; adds the human/company voice]"
— [Name], [Title], [Organization]

[Optional second quote from partner, customer, or third party]

[Boilerplate about the organization — standard, consistent paragraph]

###

Contact:
[Name]
[Title]
[Organization]
[Email]
[Phone]

---

Before/After Worked Example

Context: A mid-sized HR technology company is launching a new performance review module for its platform. The head of communications has saved three pieces of research relevant to the launch: a Gallup (2023) study on employee engagement and performance reviews, a Deloitte (2022) Global Human Capital Trends report, and an HR.com survey on performance management tool adoption.

Saved research:

• Gallup (2023): "Employees who have had ongoing performance conversations with their managers in the past six months are 3.2x more likely to be engaged at work than those who haven't."
• Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends (2022): "62% of organizations surveyed have redesigned or are currently redesigning their performance review process; the top stated reason: traditional annual reviews don't provide the timely feedback employees need."
• HR.com Survey (2023): "58% of HR leaders report that their organization's current performance management tools do not integrate with their existing HR systems."

Before (press release without research context):

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CompanyName Launches New Performance Review Module

CITY, Date — CompanyName today announced the launch of PerformanceModule, a new feature of their HR platform that helps companies conduct performance reviews.

PerformanceModule allows managers and employees to [features]. Companies using CompanyName can now [benefit].

"We're excited to launch PerformanceModule," said Name, CEO of CompanyName. "We believe this will help our customers conduct better performance reviews."

No reason to cover this. Why does this announcement matter? What problem does it solve? Nothing here is newsworthy.

After (with saved research context):

---

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CompanyName Launches PerformanceModule, Addressing Integration Gap Cited by 58% of HR Leaders

New ongoing-feedback feature responds to widespread abandonment of annual review model

CITY, Date — CompanyName, the workforce management platform serving mid-market companies, today announced the launch of PerformanceModule — a continuous performance management tool that integrates natively with HR systems to eliminate the integration gap that HR.com's 2023 survey identified as the top barrier to adoption for 58% of HR leaders.

The timing reflects an accelerating shift away from annual performance reviews. Deloitte's 2022 Global Human Capital Trends report found that 62% of organizations have redesigned or are currently redesigning their performance review process, with the stated reason consistent: traditional annual reviews don't provide the timely feedback modern workplaces require. Gallup's 2023 research on employee engagement quantifies what's at stake: "Employees who have had ongoing performance conversations with their managers in the past six months are 3.2x more likely to be engaged at work than those who haven't."

PerformanceModule addresses both dimensions of this shift: it enables the ongoing, frequent check-ins that research associates with engagement, and it integrates directly with [Organization]'s existing payroll, HRIS, and ATS modules, eliminating the manual data transfer that the HR.com survey identified as the adoption barrier for more than half of HR leaders.

"The evidence is clear that ongoing performance conversations produce better outcomes than annual reviews — what's been missing is tooling that makes ongoing conversations manageable at scale," said [Name], CEO of CompanyName. "PerformanceModule makes it as easy to conduct a 15-minute check-in as it is to schedule a meeting."

PerformanceModule is available immediately for all CompanyName customers on the Professional and Enterprise plans. [Additional feature/pricing details.]

About CompanyName [Boilerplate]

Contact: [Contact details]

Specific, cited research contextualized the problem; the headline makes a claim that connects to the data (58% integration barrier); the research was woven into the body, not listed; the quote adds voice to what the research established.

---

Prompts to Reuse

Press Release From Saved Research

I'm writing a press release for: [What is being announced]
Organization: [Name]
Audience: [Which journalists/publications — defines what's newsworthy to them]
Newsworthiness: [Why is this announcement significant / timely / relevant to this audience]

Saved research to integrate:
Best data point for significance hook:
  "[Data point]" — Source: [Organization, Year]
  Where to use: [Lead / First body paragraph / Second body paragraph]
  
Supporting context:
  "[Finding]" — Source: [Organization, Year] — Purpose: [Establishes trend / Quantifies problem / Contextualizes timing]

Announcement specifics:
  What is being announced: [Product / Partnership / Research / Event / Achievement]
  What problem it solves / What need it serves: [...]
  Key features or details: [...]
  What is distinctive: [What this does that alternatives don't]

Spokesperson: [Name, Title] — Approved quote: "[Quote text]"
Boilerplate: "[Standard organization description]"
Contact: [Name, Title, Email, Phone]

Draft a press release following the standard format:
Headline: [Makes a claim that connects to the research context — not just "X announces Y"]
Dateline and lead: [Lead paragraph covers 5Ws — announcement first, not research first]
Body paragraph 1: Significance context using research — "According to [Source] ([Year]), [data]..."
Body paragraph 2: Announcement details
Body paragraph 3: Additional context or information
Quote: [From spokesperson — adds perspective, not restatement of lead]
Boilerplate: [Standard description]
### [End marker]
Contact: [...]

Research integration rules:
- One or two research citations maximum — more buries the news
- Lead with the announcement, not the data
- The headline should make a claim, not describe a research finding
- Research citations in body text: "According to [Source] ([Year]), [specific finding]."
- Don't use research to support claims the organization is making about itself

---

Key Takeaways

1. Research provides significance and context — not the lede: lead with the announcement, not the data; the research belongs in the first or second body paragraph.
2. One or two research citations maximum: a press release is not a research report; more than two citations buries the news.
3. The best research data point is specific, credible, current, and directly relevant: a Gartner percentage on the specific problem your announcement solves is far more useful than a general industry trend.
4. The headline should make a claim connected to the research: "CompanyName Launches X, Addressing [Problem] Cited by [N]% of Leaders" is stronger than "CompanyName Announces X."
5. Research doesn't make an unnewsworthy announcement newsworthy: if the news isn't genuinely significant, adding market data doesn't change that — journalists see through the pattern.

---

Conclusion

A press release written from your saved research transforms a standard product or partnership announcement into a market-contextualized news story. The research tells journalists why the announcement matters — not because you assert it's significant, but because published, verifiable data establishes the context in which the announcement is meaningful. The discipline is using research to support newsworthiness rather than to replace it: one or two specific, credible data points, integrated into the body paragraphs rather than leading the story, and sourced accurately so journalists can verify them independently.

See also: Web Clipping for Research Papers.